PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALD vs. PLTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALD vs. PLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALD achieves a -49.10% return, which is significantly lower than PLTD's 37.23% return.


PALD

1D
-9.16%
1M
-17.17%
YTD
-49.10%
6M
-48.38%
1Y
-45.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTD

1D
-2.51%
1M
32.48%
YTD
37.23%
6M
42.42%
1Y
-5.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALD vs. PLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PALD
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
-49.10%-3.89%
PLTD
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares
37.23%-55.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PALD and PLTD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALD vs. PLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALD
PALD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PALD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PALD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTD
PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALD vs. PLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALDPLTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.15

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.01

-0.24

-1.77

PALD vs. PLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALD Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the PLTD Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALD and PLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALD vs. PLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALD drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, smaller than the maximum PLTD drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALD and PLTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDPLTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.23%

-77.34%

+17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.23%

-38.90%

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.23%

-64.86%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-59.63%

+36.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.61%

23.84%

-1.23%

Volatility

PALD vs. PLTD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) have volatilities of 18.31% and 19.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDPLTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.31%

19.02%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.90%

38.85%

-4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.26%

51.43%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.97%

63.30%

-22.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.97%

63.30%

-22.33%

PALD vs. PLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALD has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTD's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALD vs. PLTD - Dividend Comparison

PALD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than PLTD's 2.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PALD and PLTD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTD has higher volatility (19.02%) compared to PALD (18.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALD dropped -60.23% vs PLTD's -77.34%.

On 1-year performance, PLTD leads with -5.64% vs -45.37% for PALD. On fees, PLTD is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, PALD has been the lower-risk option at 18.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTD has performed better with a -5.64% return vs -45.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTD is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for PALD.

PALD has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 2.55% for PLTD.

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for PALD and 0.98% for PLTD.

PLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALD and PLTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer