PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAJS.L achieves a 10,891.43% return, which is significantly higher than LDAG.L's 15.54% return.


PAJS.L

1D
0.90%
1M
0.76%
6M
5.25%
YTD
10,891.43%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
10Y*

LDAG.L

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.06%
6M
13.97%
YTD
15.54%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10,891.43%-98.87%0.76%8.67%-13.67%-28.63%
LDAG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
15.54%26.42%5.50%3.28%1.73%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PAJS.L and LDAG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LDAG.L
LDAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAJS.LLDAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+280.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

89.67

1.27

+88.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

2.30

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

5.88

-5.41

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAJS.L and LDAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAJS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than LDAG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAJS.L and LDAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAJS.LLDAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-33.08%

-66.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.06%

-9.58%

-89.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.06%

-19.89%

-79.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.02%

-3.35%

-12.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-19.63%

-16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.77%

3.75%

+45.02%

Volatility

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that PAJS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAJS.LLDAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

3.90%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1,130.17%

11.34%

+1,118.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27,873.17%

14.07%

+27,859.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13,124.87%

19.86%

+13,105.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13,124.87%

22.59%

+13,102.28%

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAJS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LDAG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAJS.L vs. LDAG.L - Dividend Comparison

PAJS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDAG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
3.90%4.23%4.75%5.40%4.80%2.19%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAJS.L and LDAG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LDAG.L.

PAJS.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while LDAG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while LDAG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAJS.L and 0.40% for LDAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAJS.L and LDAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer