LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L).
LDAG.L and VAPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LDAG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2021. VAPX.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on May 21, 2013. Both LDAG.L and VAPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LDAG.L or VAPX.L.
Key characteristics
| LDAG.L | VAPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.07% | -0.58% |
| 1Y Return | 13.43% | 5.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.05% | 1.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.09 | 0.35 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.32% | 14.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.60% | -30.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.09% | -4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDAG.L and VAPX.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LDAG.L achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than VAPX.L's -0.58% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDAG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison
LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than VAPX.L's 2.49% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 5.05% | 5.40% | 4.80% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.49% | 3.51% | 4.31% | 3.53% | 2.05% | 3.39% | 3.54% | 3.08% | 2.71% | 3.44% | 2.26% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDAG.L drawdown since its inception was -14.60%, smaller than the maximum VAPX.L drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDAG.L and VAPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LDAG.L vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.