PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAJRX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund (PAJRX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAJRX achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PAJRX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 6.57%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.


PAJRX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.28%
6M
2.60%
YTD
4.88%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
6.57%
ALL TIME*
6.38%

TRLGX

1D
2.28%
1M
-1.09%
6M
3.17%
YTD
0.26%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
17.47%
ALL TIME*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAJRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund
4.88%11.19%8.25%12.09%-14.19%9.85%13.00%17.49%-4.84%12.62%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
0.26%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PAJRX and TRLGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2013

0.83

The correlation between PAJRX and TRLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAJRX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAJRX
PAJRX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PAJRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund (PAJRX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAJRXTRLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.08

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

0.39

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

1.15

+7.80

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAJRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAJRX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAJRX drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAJRX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAJRXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-55.56%

+33.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-18.18%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.27%

-21.17%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-40.44%

+20.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.48%

-40.44%

+17.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-5.48%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-8.65%

+5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

6.08%

-4.96%

Volatility

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund (PAJRX) is 1.58%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that PAJRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAJRXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

5.12%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

14.09%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.31%

17.23%

-10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.93%

22.57%

-14.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

21.80%

-13.18%

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAJRX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAJRX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

PAJRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than TRLGX's 13.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAJRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund
6.56%6.88%5.29%3.57%7.51%4.03%3.21%3.39%4.61%1.71%1.53%1.64%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.66%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAJRX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to PAJRX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAJRX dropped -22.48% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

PAJRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAJRX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer