PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAIIX vs. DFGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PAIIX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAIIX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than DFGBX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PAIIX has outperformed DFGBX with an annualized return of 2.90%, while DFGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.28% annualized return.


PAIIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.12%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
2.90%

DFGBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
1.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAIIX
PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
-0.60%8.23%4.02%6.63%-6.00%-0.84%6.95%6.40%-0.80%3.97%
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.25%3.13%5.37%5.00%-6.63%-1.03%1.52%4.04%1.68%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PAIIX and DFGBX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 1995

0.50

The correlation between PAIIX and DFGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAIIX vs. DFGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAIIX
PAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGBX
DFGBX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DFGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PAIIX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAIIXDFGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.82

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

4.95

-1.25

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the DFGBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAIIX and DFGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAIIXDFGBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.66

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.74

+0.36

Drawdowns

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAIIX drawdown since its inception was -13.59%, which is greater than DFGBX's maximum drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAIIX and DFGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAIIXDFGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.59%

-9.63%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

-1.38%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.25%

-1.67%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.83%

-9.63%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.44%

-9.63%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.10%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-0.93%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.50%

+0.79%

Volatility

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PAIIX) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) at 0.58%. This indicates that PAIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAIIXDFGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

0.58%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

1.31%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09%

1.88%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.42%

2.20%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.01%

1.93%

+1.08%

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAIIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGBX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAIIX vs. DFGBX - Dividend Comparison

PAIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than DFGBX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
3.43%2.91%4.69%3.61%1.63%0.73%0.03%2.30%4.74%0.89%1.16%1.72%
PAIIX
PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.69%4.44%3.72%2.05%7.25%2.59%1.90%3.75%1.78%2.73%2.23%5.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAIIX and DFGBX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAIIX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to DFGBX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAIIX dropped -13.59% vs DFGBX's -9.63%.

DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAIIX and DFGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer