PAGS vs. TAN
PAGS (PagSeguro Digital Ltd.) is a stock, while TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. Over the past 5 years, PAGS returned -28.84%/yr vs -1.65%/yr for TAN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAGS vs. TAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAGS achieves a -5.89% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 43.10% return.
PAGS
- 1D
- -4.88%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- -5.89%
- 6M
- -12.09%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- -2.32%
- 5Y*
- -28.84%
- 10Y*
- —
TAN
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 20.40%
- YTD
- 43.10%
- 6M
- 48.35%
- 1Y
- 112.42%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
PAGS vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | -5.89% | 60.75% | -49.80% | 42.68% | -66.67% | -53.90% | 66.51% | 82.38% | -35.86% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 43.10% | 48.31% | -37.61% | -26.79% | -5.24% | -25.10% | 233.96% | 66.53% | -25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAGS and TAN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.46 |
The correlation between PAGS and TAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAGS vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank
PAGS
TAN
PAGS vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAGS | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.44 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 8.30 | -8.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 20.09 | -19.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAGS | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 3.05 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | -0.04 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | -0.12 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PAGS vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAGS drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGS and TAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAGS | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -95.29% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.36% | -13.62% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.60% | -64.40% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.84% | -73.95% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.71% | -67.72% | -16.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.40% | -78.51% | +23.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 5.62% | +6.73% |
Volatility
PAGS vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison
PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) has a higher volatility of 17.52% compared to Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) at 12.15%. This indicates that PAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAGS | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.52% | 12.15% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.55% | 25.32% | +9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.21% | 37.29% | +11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.37% | 39.74% | +21.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.14% | 37.98% | +23.16% |
Dividends
PAGS vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison
PAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, while TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 7.07% | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.69% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAGS and TAN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAGS has higher volatility (17.52%) compared to TAN (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGS dropped -90.00% vs TAN's -95.29%.
TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAGS and TAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer