PAGRX vs. DBMF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF).

PAGRX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990. DBMF is an actively managed fund by Litman Gregory Capital Partners LLC. It was launched on May 8, 2019.

Performance

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio	-3.85%	36.92%	44.52%	38.73%	-26.06%	24.84%	37.65%	16.07%
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	7.87%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGRX achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 7.87% return.

PAGRX

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -8.33%
• YTD: -3.85%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 39.42%
• 3Y*: 34.02%
• 5Y*: 17.10%
• 10Y*: 18.68%

DBMF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 15.44%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAGRX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

PAGRX

Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio

DBMF

iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

PAGRX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGRX

PAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 95
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAGRX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.19	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.98	-0.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.46	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	4.25	-1.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.26	18.51	-5.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGRX and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAGRX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.19	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.68	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.74	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between PAGRX and DBMF is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

PAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DBMF's 5.30% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio	0.03%	0.03%	5.62%	2.72%	7.79%	6.82%	15.08%	17.51%	12.33%	8.70%	16.94%	6.31%
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.30%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGRX drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGRX and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAGRX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.87%	-20.39%	-35.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-6.10%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.52%	-20.39%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.14%	-3.82%	-5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-6.70%	-3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	1.40%	+1.30%

Volatility

PAGRX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAGRX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	5.24%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.43%	11.10%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.49%	12.09%	+13.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	12.66%	+11.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.47%	12.48%	+11.99%