PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAGDX vs. AMANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) and Amana Income Fund Investor Shares (AMANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGDX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than AMANX's 12.65% return.


PAGDX

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.16%
6M
3.35%
YTD
6.76%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
30.89%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.16%

AMANX

1D
1.60%
1M
-0.31%
6M
10.23%
YTD
12.65%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.79%
ALL TIME*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
6.76%36.58%44.15%38.39%-26.25%24.53%37.32%40.01%-12.62%19.29%
AMANX
Amana Income Fund Investor Shares
12.65%16.41%12.85%13.60%-8.86%22.53%13.98%25.31%-5.17%21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PAGDX and AMANX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.75

The correlation between PAGDX and AMANX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAGDX vs. AMANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAGDX
PAGDX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AMANX
AMANX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) and Amana Income Fund Investor Shares (AMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAGDXAMANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

1.79

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

7.10

-0.32

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the AMANX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGDX and AMANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGDX drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, roughly equal to the maximum AMANX drawdown of -37.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGDX and AMANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAGDXAMANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-37.82%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-11.03%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.37%

-15.42%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-19.19%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.13%

-1.11%

-7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-5.98%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.77%

+0.35%

Volatility

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Volatility Comparison

Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Amana Income Fund Investor Shares (AMANX) at 3.48%. This indicates that PAGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAGDXAMANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.48%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

10.93%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

13.27%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

14.08%

+10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.88%

15.95%

+8.93%

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAGDX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AMANX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAGDX vs. AMANX - Dividend Comparison

PAGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than AMANX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMANX
Amana Income Fund Investor Shares
4.79%5.39%5.69%5.24%8.14%4.66%6.53%7.81%6.55%5.75%4.15%6.88%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
0.03%0.03%5.48%2.59%7.53%6.80%14.94%16.97%12.25%8.50%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAGDX and AMANX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAGDX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to AMANX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGDX dropped -38.03% vs AMANX's -37.82%.

AMANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAGDX and AMANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer