PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAFTX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2055 Fund (PAFTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFTX achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PAFTX has outperformed FRQAX with an annualized return of 10.98%, while FRQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.87% annualized return.


PAFTX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.19%
6M
7.83%
YTD
11.22%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
10.98%

FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.62%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAFTX
T. Rowe Price Target 2055 Fund
11.22%18.41%13.80%20.29%-19.48%16.76%18.05%24.60%-7.72%20.49%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFTX and FRQAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2013

0.83

The correlation between PAFTX and FRQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAFTX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFTX
PAFTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PAFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PAFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2055 Fund (PAFTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAFTXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.30

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

9.55

-0.14

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFTX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFTX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFTX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAFTXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-38.22%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.62%

-3.46%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-5.27%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-17.24%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

-17.24%

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.43%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-4.56%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

0.83%

+1.39%

Volatility

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Target 2055 Fund (PAFTX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.58%. This indicates that PAFTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAFTXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

1.58%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

3.67%

+6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

4.33%

+8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

5.59%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

5.28%

+9.90%

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFTX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAFTX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

PAFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than FRQAX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.89%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%
PAFTX
T. Rowe Price Target 2055 Fund
4.04%4.49%2.19%2.44%5.01%3.35%2.42%4.00%5.86%2.16%2.64%3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAFTX and FRQAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAFTX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FRQAX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFTX dropped -31.88% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAFTX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer