PAFRX vs. LFRIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PAFRX (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund) and LFRIX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, PAFRX returned 4.46%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for LFRIX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAFRX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LFRIX.

Performance

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFRX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than LFRIX's 1.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PAFRX having a 4.46% annualized return and LFRIX not far ahead at 4.58%.

PAFRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 5.53%
• 3Y*: 7.68%
• 5Y*: 5.13%
• 10Y*: 4.46%

LFRIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.62%
• 1Y: 6.46%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 4.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund	1.31%	6.37%	7.89%	10.68%	-2.11%	4.38%	1.53%	8.32%	-0.29%	3.27%
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund	1.91%	6.30%	8.28%	12.22%	-2.99%	5.48%	-1.47%	7.59%	-0.01%	3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFRX and LFRIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2011	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between PAFRX and LFRIX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PAFRX vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFRX

PAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 84
PAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

LFRIX

LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAFRX	LFRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.68	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.71	6.22	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.89	2.10	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	4.18	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.73	15.86	-2.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the LFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFRX and LFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAFRX	LFRIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.68	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.94	1.92	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.18	1.17	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.12	+0.13

Drawdowns

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum LFRIX drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFRX and LFRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAFRX	LFRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.95%	-27.90%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.51%	-1.55%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.47%	-2.59%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.03%	-6.23%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.95%	-21.75%	+1.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-1.94%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.40%	0.41%	-0.01%

Volatility

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) is 0.60%, while Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that PAFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAFRX	LFRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	0.64%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.71%	1.86%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24%	2.42%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.66%	2.86%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.80%	3.91%	-0.11%

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFRX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAFRX vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison

PAFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than LFRIX's 6.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund	6.89%	7.20%	7.68%	7.63%	3.95%	4.01%	4.64%	5.71%	5.60%	4.65%	4.64%	4.72%
PAFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund	6.62%	6.81%	7.34%	6.87%	3.85%	3.66%	3.79%	4.62%	4.64%	3.83%	3.87%	3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAFRX and LFRIX in my portfolio?

PAFRX and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAFRX or LFRIX?

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to PAFRX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFRX dropped -19.95% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.