PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAFRX vs. FLOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFRX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than FLOTX's -0.55% return.


PAFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.99%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
4.46%

FLOTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
1.31%6.37%7.89%10.68%-2.11%4.38%1.53%8.32%-0.72%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.55%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFRX and FLOTX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAFRX vs. FLOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFRX
PAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAFRXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.01

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.71

2.92

+2.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.46

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.42

+2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.73

3.82

+9.91

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FLOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFRX and FLOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAFRXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.01

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.94

1.02

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Drawdowns

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, which is greater than FLOTX's maximum drawdown of -4.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFRX and FLOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAFRXFLOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-4.40%

-15.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-2.36%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.47%

-3.34%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.03%

-4.40%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-1.03%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.87%

-0.47%

Volatility

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PAFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAFRXFLOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.43%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

1.34%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

1.66%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.66%

2.68%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

2.46%

+1.34%

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFRX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOTX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAFRX vs. FLOTX - Dividend Comparison

PAFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than FLOTX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.80%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
6.62%6.81%7.34%6.87%3.85%3.66%3.79%4.62%4.64%3.83%3.87%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAFRX and FLOTX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAFRX has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to FLOTX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFRX dropped -19.95% vs FLOTX's -4.40%.

PAFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAFRX and FLOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer