PAFGX vs. MHEIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PAFGX (T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund) and MHEIX (MH Elite Income Fund of Funds) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, PAFGX returned 8.08%/yr vs 3.18%/yr for MHEIX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAFGX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHEIX.

Performance

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) and MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFGX achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than MHEIX's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PAFGX has outperformed MHEIX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while MHEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.18% annualized return.

PAFGX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 6.05%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: 12.48%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: 8.08%

MHEIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 7.36%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 3.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAFGX T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund	6.05%	14.75%	9.43%	13.48%	-14.80%	8.83%	14.45%	19.91%	-7.15%	15.77%
MHEIX MH Elite Income Fund of Funds	2.09%	4.76%	5.98%	7.55%	-9.83%	2.44%	5.27%	11.10%	-3.24%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFGX and MHEIX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between PAFGX and MHEIX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PAFGX vs. MHEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFGX

PAFGX Risk / Return Rank: 54
PAFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
PAFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PAFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PAFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PAFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

MHEIX

MHEIX Risk / Return Rank: 34
MHEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MHEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MHEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MHEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MHEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) and MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAFGX	MHEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.28	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.86	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	1.77	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.00	4.47	+5.53

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MHEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFGX and MHEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFGX drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, which is greater than MHEIX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFGX and MHEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAFGX	MHEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-16.95%	-7.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.79%	-4.54%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.63%	-6.57%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	-13.62%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.45%	-16.95%	-7.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-1.81%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-2.47%	-1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.79%	-0.21%

Volatility

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX) at 1.18%. This indicates that PAFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAFGX	MHEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	1.18%	+2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.08%	5.92%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.34%	6.25%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.56%	5.58%	+3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.21%	5.24%	+4.97%

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than MHEIX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAFGX vs. MHEIX - Dividend Comparison

PAFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than MHEIX's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MHEIX MH Elite Income Fund of Funds	3.71%	0.00%	3.33%	2.38%	3.17%	1.49%	2.30%	2.21%	2.10%	1.69%	2.48%	2.87%
PAFGX T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund	6.36%	6.75%	5.00%	2.32%	2.74%	7.14%	0.79%	2.92%	2.26%	0.75%	0.36%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAFGX and MHEIX in my portfolio?

PAFGX and MHEIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAFGX or MHEIX?

PAFGX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to MHEIX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFGX dropped -24.45% vs MHEIX's -16.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.