PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAES.L vs. SPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Europe ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAES.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAES.L achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 11.61% return.


PAES.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.99%
YTD
7.62%
6M
7.96%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
10Y*

SPOL.L

1D
-1.74%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
11.61%
6M
12.04%
1Y
36.23%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAES.L
Invesco MSCI Europe ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
7.62%19.00%1.22%14.38%-12.18%8,263.00%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.61%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PAES.L and SPOL.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.54

The correlation between PAES.L and SPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAES.L
PAES.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Europe ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAES.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAES.LSPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+169.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

82.48

1.26

+81.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

3.79

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

8.99

-8.19

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAES.L and SPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAES.L drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than SPOL.L's maximum drawdown of -67.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAES.L and SPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAES.LSPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.03%

-67.31%

-31.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.03%

-9.51%

-89.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.03%

-22.70%

-76.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-5.78%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-41.64%

+35.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.84%

4.02%

+17.82%

Volatility

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Europe ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAES.L) is 3.24%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that PAES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAES.LSPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

6.83%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

17.93%

-6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17,060.70%

23.40%

+17,037.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8,952.50%

30.68%

+8,921.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8,952.50%

27.33%

+8,925.17%

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAES.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAES.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAES.L nor SPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PAES.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAES.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAES.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

PAES.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAES.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAES.L and SPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer