PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAERX vs. PRSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2010 Fund (PAERX) and T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAERX achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than PRSCX's 38.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PAERX has underperformed PRSCX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while PRSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.06% annualized return.


PAERX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.58%
YTD
4.57%
6M
4.79%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
5.39%

PRSCX

1D
-2.18%
1M
12.15%
YTD
38.35%
6M
34.30%
1Y
79.18%
3Y*
39.44%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
23.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAERX
T. Rowe Price Target 2010 Fund
4.57%10.28%7.03%10.51%-12.97%7.13%10.69%14.61%-3.43%8.29%
PRSCX
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund
38.35%24.28%40.49%53.77%-35.40%5.83%45.94%53.80%-7.52%39.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PAERX and PRSCX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2013

0.75

The correlation between PAERX and PRSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAERX vs. PRSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAERX
PAERX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PAERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAERX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PAERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSCX
PRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2010 Fund (PAERX) and T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAERXPRSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.54

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.56

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

17.00

-4.67

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the PRSCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAERX and PRSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAERXPRSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

3.43

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.94

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.52

+0.30

Drawdowns

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAERX drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum PRSCX drawdown of -85.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAERX and PRSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAERXPRSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-85.26%

+67.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.19%

-17.99%

+13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.79%

-31.06%

+25.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.58%

-46.19%

+28.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.08%

-46.19%

+28.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-2.18%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-29.89%

+27.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

4.75%

-3.82%

Volatility

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Target 2010 Fund (PAERX) is 1.63%, while T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that PAERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAERXPRSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

9.64%

-8.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.12%

19.75%

-15.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

23.89%

-18.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

27.83%

-21.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.55%

24.81%

-18.26%

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAERX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSCX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAERX vs. PRSCX - Dividend Comparison

PAERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than PRSCX's 8.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAERX
T. Rowe Price Target 2010 Fund
4.72%4.94%4.08%3.41%7.51%7.32%5.14%2.87%4.66%1.43%0.65%0.87%
PRSCX
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund
8.33%11.53%9.43%0.00%7.83%33.69%13.90%10.91%36.03%13.21%3.68%18.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAERX and PRSCX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRSCX has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to PAERX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAERX dropped -18.08% vs PRSCX's -85.26%.

PRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAERX and PRSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer