PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAELX vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (PAELX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAELX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than TBCIX's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PAELX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.


PAELX

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.16%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.93%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
2.51%

TBCIX

1D
1.92%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
1.88%
6M
1.60%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAELX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
0.80%19.02%-4.90%14.00%-12.54%-9.77%3.80%13.03%-7.73%15.33%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
1.88%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PAELX and TBCIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAELX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAELX
PAELX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PAELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAELX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PAELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAELX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (PAELX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAELXTBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.07

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

3.53

+0.89

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAELX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAELX drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAELX and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAELXTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-43.26%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-16.96%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.77%

-23.06%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-43.26%

+17.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.32%

-43.26%

+13.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-4.13%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-8.05%

-6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

5.12%

-3.00%

Volatility

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (PAELX) is 2.11%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that PAELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAELXTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

6.44%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

13.28%

-7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

16.54%

-9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

24.02%

-16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

22.82%

-14.13%

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAELX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAELX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

PAELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than TBCIX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAELX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
6.05%5.70%5.71%5.06%4.25%4.71%4.03%5.19%5.91%5.40%5.46%5.87%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.11%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAELX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to PAELX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAELX dropped -34.71% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

PAELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAELX and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer