PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAEKX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAEKX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.19% return.


PAEKX

1D
0.45%
1M
4.73%
YTD
10.74%
6M
11.67%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*

FTLSX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.44%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAEKX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund
10.74%18.99%13.81%29.68%-17.07%18.57%15.16%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.19%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PAEKX and FTLSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.70

The correlation between PAEKX and FTLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAEKX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAEKX
PAEKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAEKXFTLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.32

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.74

14.65

+1.08

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAEKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAEKX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAEKXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.67

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.65

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.96

-0.19

Drawdowns

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAEKX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEKX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAEKXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-15.74%

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-3.65%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-4.83%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-15.74%

-7.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-2.81%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

0.82%

+0.85%

Volatility

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund (PAEKX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.79%. This indicates that PAEKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAEKXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

1.79%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

3.80%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

4.54%

+5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

5.43%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

4.78%

+12.20%

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAEKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAEKX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

PAEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.53%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%
PAEKX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2050 Fund
9.11%10.09%5.96%5.08%11.27%17.66%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAEKX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAEKX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to FTLSX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAEKX dropped -30.72% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAEKX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer