PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE
PAEEM.PA (Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc) and LYMZ.DE (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAEEM.PA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM ex-Egypt ESG Broad CTB Select Index, while LYMZ.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAEEM.PA returned 7.56%/yr vs 18.78%/yr for LYMZ.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAEEM.PA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LYMZ.DE.
Performance
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAEEM.PA achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than LYMZ.DE's 15.91% return.
PAEEM.PA
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.87%
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.80%
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAEEM.PA Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc | 20.72% | 22.47% | 13.04% | 3.26% | -15.31% | 4.42% | 8.27% | 4.74% |
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | 15.91% | 39.84% | 15.20% | 41.50% | -21.86% | 49.30% | -15.91% | 19.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAEEM.PA and LYMZ.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PAEEM.PA and LYMZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAEEM.PA
LYMZ.DE
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAEEM.PA | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 1.61 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 5.29 | +4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAEEM.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.94%, smaller than the maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown of -86.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEEM.PA and LYMZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAEEM.PA | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.94% | -86.87% | +54.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -21.17% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -31.42% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -44.27% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -5.80% | -4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -50.90% | +40.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 6.45% | -2.79% |
Volatility
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) at 8.02%. This indicates that PAEEM.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAEEM.PA | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 8.02% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.05% | 26.45% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.37% | 31.88% | -11.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 34.92% | -17.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 35.60% | -16.11% |
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAEEM.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAEEM.PA vs. LYMZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAEEM.PA nor LYMZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAEEM.PA and LYMZ.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAEEM.PA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAEEM.PA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LYMZ.DE.
PAEEM.PA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LYMZ.DE is Leveraged Equities. PAEEM.PA tracks MSCI EM ex-Egypt ESG Broad CTB Select Index, while LYMZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for PAEEM.PA and 0.40% for LYMZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAEEM.PA and LYMZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer