PACW.L vs. LGGL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) and LGGL.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while LGGL.L tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PACW.L returned 30.12% vs 27.11% for LGGL.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PACW.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGL.L.

Performance

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PACW.L is traded in GBP, while LGGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGGL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACW.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than LGGL.L's 10.33% return.

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 11.76%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LGGL.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 27.11%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	10.33%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PACW.L and LGGL.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.90

The correlation between PACW.L and LGGL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

LGGL.L

LGGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LGGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LGGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LGGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LGGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PACW.L	LGGL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	2.34	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	3.22	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.43	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.27	4.11	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.43	15.34	+2.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACW.L and LGGL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PACW.L	LGGL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	2.34	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.83	+0.40

Drawdowns

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum LGGL.L drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACW.L and LGGL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PACW.L	LGGL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.68%	-25.97%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.06%	-6.56%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.11%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-3.29%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.77%	-0.04%

Volatility

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) is 2.93%, while L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that PACW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGGL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PACW.L	LGGL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	3.29%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	8.87%	-1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42%	11.55%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	14.42%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	16.24%	-2.33%

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACW.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LGGL.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PACW.L vs. LGGL.L - Dividend Comparison

PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while LGGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PACW.L and LGGL.L in my portfolio?

PACW.L and LGGL.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PACW.L or LGGL.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PACW.L or LGGL.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LGGL.L.

What is the main difference between PACW.L and LGGL.L?

PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PACW.L and 0.10% for LGGL.L.