PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACW.L vs. FEDF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PACW.L is traded in GBP, while FEDF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEDF.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACW.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than FEDF.L's 1.94% return.


PACW.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.31%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEDF.L

1D
0.04%
1M
1.22%
YTD
1.94%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PACW.L and FEDF.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACW.L
PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDF.L
FEDF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACW.LFEDF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.13

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

0.95

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.43

2.57

+14.86

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACW.L and FEDF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACW.LFEDF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

0.74

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.37

+0.87

Drawdowns

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum FEDF.L drawdown of -19.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACW.L and FEDF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACW.LFEDF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-19.27%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-5.17%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-5.89%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-7.85%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.91%

-0.18%

Volatility

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) at 1.78%. This indicates that PACW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACW.LFEDF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.78%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

4.98%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

6.62%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

8.49%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

9.50%

+4.41%

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACW.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDF.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PACW.L vs. FEDF.L - Dividend Comparison

PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while FEDF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


PACW.L and FEDF.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for FEDF.L.

PACW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FEDF.L is Money Market. PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while FEDF.L tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PACW.L and 0.10% for FEDF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACW.L and FEDF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer