PACAX vs. MHELX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PACAX (Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund) and MHELX (MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, PACAX returned 5.18%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for MHELX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PACAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHELX.

Performance

PACAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund (PACAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACAX achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PACAX has underperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.

PACAX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.37%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.18%

MHELX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 20.19%
• 1Y: 39.35%
• 3Y*: 15.27%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PACAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund	3.96%	10.62%	9.30%	11.24%	-14.68%	5.64%	10.05%	11.82%	-4.78%	9.72%
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund	17.65%	3.45%	12.51%	16.30%	-20.27%	14.07%	20.57%	22.49%	-12.76%	12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PACAX and MHELX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1998	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between PACAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PACAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACAX

PACAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
PACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MHELX

MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 64
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund (PACAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PACAX	MHELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.06	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	2.92	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.39	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	4.64	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.02	15.69	-1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PACAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PACAX	MHELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.06	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.24	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.43	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.33	+0.54

Drawdowns

PACAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACAX drawdown since its inception was -32.99%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACAX and MHELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PACAX	MHELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.99%	-61.24%	+28.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.94%	-8.52%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.83%	-30.81%	+22.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	-32.01%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.06%	-39.02%	+19.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.60%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-12.93%	+10.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	2.51%	-1.62%

Volatility

PACAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund (PACAX) is 1.81%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that PACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PACAX	MHELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.81%	4.53%	-2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.17%	15.24%	-11.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.21%	19.23%	-14.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.27%	21.00%	-13.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.55%	20.97%	-14.42%

PACAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PACAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

PACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund	6.13%	0.00%	2.19%	0.00%	14.45%	5.03%	2.70%	6.13%	0.00%	5.17%	5.51%	6.93%
PACAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund	4.16%	5.00%	4.64%	2.14%	6.18%	4.33%	3.86%	2.37%	4.77%	2.23%	2.39%	7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PACAX and MHELX in my portfolio?

PACAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PACAX or MHELX?

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to PACAX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACAX dropped -32.99% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.