PACAX vs. FSIRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PACAX (Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund) and FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, PACAX returned 4.87%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for FSIRX. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PACAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSIRX.

Performance

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund (PACAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACAX achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PACAX has underperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 4.87%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.47% annualized return.

PACAX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 2.11%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 1Y: 8.54%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: 3.48%
• 10Y*: 4.87%
• ALL TIME*: 5.67%

FSIRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 3.41%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 1Y: 13.22%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 5.47%
• ALL TIME*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PACAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PACAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund	3.12%	10.62%	9.30%	11.24%	-14.68%	5.64%	10.05%	11.82%	-4.78%	9.72%
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	7.04%	10.38%	5.83%	4.58%	-3.34%	15.89%	3.72%	10.55%	-3.99%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PACAX and FSIRX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between PACAX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PACAX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PACAX

PACAX Risk / Return Rank: 61
PACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FSIRX

FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund (PACAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PACAX	FSIRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.54	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.46	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.61	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	11.63	-2.57

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACAX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACAX drawdown since its inception was -32.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACAX and FSIRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PACAX	FSIRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.99%	-33.39%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.94%	-3.53%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.83%	-5.81%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	-12.82%	-6.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.06%	-19.98%	+0.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-2.28%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-4.15%	+1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.09%	-0.15%

Volatility

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund (PACAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) have volatilities of 1.78% and 1.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PACAX	FSIRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.78%	1.75%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.73%	3.98%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	5.07%	+0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.35%	6.93%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.56%	6.75%	-0.19%

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PACAX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

PACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than FSIRX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	3.23%	4.72%	4.80%	5.28%	7.33%	5.37%	2.23%	3.09%	9.42%	2.63%	2.37%	1.75%
PACAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund	3.87%	5.00%	4.64%	2.14%	6.18%	4.33%	3.86%	2.37%	4.77%	2.23%	2.39%	7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PACAX and FSIRX in my portfolio?

PACAX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PACAX or FSIRX?

PACAX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to FSIRX (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACAX dropped -32.99% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.