PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAC vs. SJ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAC is traded in USD, while SJ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SJ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAC achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than SJ.TO's -5.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PAC has outperformed SJ.TO with an annualized return of 13.59%, while SJ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


PAC

1D
0.75%
1M
-7.99%
YTD
-14.21%
6M
-5.86%
1Y
-3.21%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
19.59%
10Y*
13.59%

SJ.TO

1D
1.78%
1M
12.57%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
-14.21%56.30%4.19%28.64%9.79%29.95%-6.17%54.36%-15.66%32.15%
SJ.TO
Stella-Jones Inc.
-5.51%27.33%-13.70%65.25%16.37%-12.11%28.35%0.14%-26.86%25.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PAC and SJ.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.17

The correlation between PAC and SJ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAC:

$11.43B

SJ.TO:

CA$4.46B

EPS

PAC:

$214.01

SJ.TO:

CA$5.52

PE Ratio

PAC:

1.06

SJ.TO:

14.79

PEG Ratio

PAC:

0.06

SJ.TO:

0.93

PS Ratio

PAC:

0.35

SJ.TO:

1.28

PB Ratio

PAC:

0.44

SJ.TO:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAC:

$32.84B

SJ.TO:

CA$3.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAC:

$10.93B

SJ.TO:

CA$678.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAC:

$20.54B

SJ.TO:

CA$617.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAC vs. SJ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAC
PAC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SJ.TO
SJ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SJ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACSJ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.04

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

0.10

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

0.28

-0.54

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the SJ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAC and SJ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACSJ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

0.11

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.37

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.22

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.59

-0.13

Drawdowns

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAC drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, smaller than the maximum SJ.TO drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC and SJ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACSJ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.20%

-78.70%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.31%

-29.37%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.83%

-35.89%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.83%

-35.89%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.65%

-60.01%

-6.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.71%

-20.49%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.52%

-17.16%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.08%

10.12%

+1.96%

Volatility

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) at 6.77%. This indicates that PAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACSJ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

6.77%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.88%

20.51%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.62%

26.56%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.08%

27.73%

+8.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.49%

26.71%

+11.78%

Dividends

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Dividend Comparison

PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than SJ.TO's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
1.97%3.33%4.14%4.88%5.02%4.17%0.00%4.99%6.27%5.83%4.50%3.98%
SJ.TO
Stella-Jones Inc.
1.18%1.46%1.57%1.19%1.65%1.80%1.30%1.49%1.21%0.87%0.92%0.61%

Financials

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Stella-Jones Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
11.37B
791.00M
(PAC) Total Revenue
(SJ.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PAC values in USD, SJ.TO values in CAD

PAC vs. SJ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Stella-Jones Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
55.3%
19.0%
Portfolio components
PAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 6.29B and revenue of 11.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

SJ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stella-Jones Inc. reported a gross profit of 150.00M and revenue of 791.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

PAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 5.04B and revenue of 11.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.4%.

SJ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stella-Jones Inc. reported an operating income of 93.00M and revenue of 791.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

PAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 3.31B and revenue of 11.37B, resulting in a net margin of 29.1%.

SJ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stella-Jones Inc. reported a net income of 60.00M and revenue of 791.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAC and SJ.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAC and SJ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer