PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PABU vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PABU vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABU achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.


PABU

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.47%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.10%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PABU vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PABU
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
9.39%13.08%24.84%29.51%-15.45%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PABU and ITOT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2022

0.93

The correlation between PABU and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PABU vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PABU
ITOT

Technology

44.9%
33.8%

Real Estate

12.4%
2.4%

Financial Services

11.2%
12.1%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.4%
9.0%

Industrials

2.5%
9.5%

Utilities

1.8%
2.3%

Energy

0.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Technology

PABU
44.9%
ITOT
33.8%

Real Estate

PABU
12.4%
ITOT
2.4%

Financial Services

PABU
11.2%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

PABU
10.4%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PABU
9.0%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

PABU
7.4%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

PABU
2.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Utilities

PABU
1.8%
ITOT
2.3%

Energy

PABU
0.7%
ITOT
3.7%

Basic Materials

PABU
0.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

PABU

-

ITOT
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PABU vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABU
PABU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PABU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PABU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PABU vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PABUITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.17

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

14.57

-8.32

PABU vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PABU Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABU and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PABUITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.32

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.57

+0.16

Drawdowns

PABU vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABU drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABU and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PABUITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.76%

-55.20%

+32.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-8.90%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-19.44%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.73%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-6.97%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

1.94%

+1.88%

Volatility

PABU vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that PABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PABUITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

2.99%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

9.13%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

12.20%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

17.36%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

18.26%

+0.42%

PABU vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PABU vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

PABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
PABU
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
0.86%0.90%1.00%1.06%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PABU and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PABU has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABU dropped -22.76% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.09% vs 20.14% for PABU. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.09% return vs 20.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for PABU.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.86% for PABU.

PABU tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD), while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PABU and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PABU and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer