PABG.L vs. LCPE.L
PABG.L (Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - PABG.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PABG.L returned 9.95%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PABG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PABG.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABG.L achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return.
PABG.L
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 16.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABG.L Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 5.89% | 27.75% | 9.01% | 19.40% | -11.91% | 18.30% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 15.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PABG.L and LCPE.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, PABG.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
PABG.L
LCPE.L
-
Technology
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Industrials
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
PABG.L
LCPE.L
-
Communication Services
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Energy
PABG.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
PABG.L
LCPE.L
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PABG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 4.13 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 13.66 | -8.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PABG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.44 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.04 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.98 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, roughly equal to the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABG.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.49% | -27.05% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -6.66% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -12.39% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -12.39% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -2.71% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -3.52% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.02% | +1.43% |
Volatility
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that PABG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PABG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 3.81% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 8.48% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 11.29% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.74% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 20.60% | -3.87% |
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PABG.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PABG.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PABG.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PABG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PABG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
PABG.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PABG.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for PABG.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer