PAAS vs. BYRN
PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.) and BYRN (Byrna Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. PAAS operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while BYRN operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PAAS returned 10.72%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for BYRN. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAAS vs. BYRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAAS achieves a -15.21% return, which is significantly higher than BYRN's -76.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAS has outperformed BYRN with an annualized return of 10.72%, while BYRN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.
PAAS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- 6M
- -19.06%
- YTD
- -15.21%
- 1Y
- 45.94%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
BYRN
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -40.08%
- 6M
- -77.79%
- YTD
- -76.98%
- 1Y
- -83.17%
- 3Y*
- -1.63%
- 5Y*
- -28.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
PAAS vs. BYRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | -15.21% | 160.40% | 26.61% | 2.50% | -33.00% | -26.78% | 46.88% | 63.86% | -5.30% | 3.86% |
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | -76.98% | -41.72% | 350.86% | -18.49% | -41.27% | -7.93% | 663.16% | 26.67% | 7.14% | -30.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAAS and BYRN is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
PAAS:
$18.40B
BYRN:
$87.68M
PAAS:
$3.12
BYRN:
-$0.16
PAAS:
4.43
BYRN:
0.84
PAAS:
2.51
BYRN:
1.54
PAAS:
$4.02B
BYRN:
$108.86M
PAAS:
$1.76B
BYRN:
$57.17M
PAAS:
$2.14B
BYRN:
-$3.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAAS vs. BYRN — Risk / Return Rank
PAAS
BYRN
PAAS vs. BYRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAAS | BYRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.69 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.99 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | -1.65 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAAS vs. BYRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAAS drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, smaller than the maximum BYRN drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS and BYRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAAS | BYRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.10% | -92.51% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -86.01% | +48.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.62% | -88.70% | +51.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.39% | -92.51% | +35.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.74% | -92.51% | +25.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.06% | -88.70% | +52.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -52.50% | +10.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.33% | 51.63% | -36.30% |
Volatility
PAAS vs. BYRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is 15.22%, while Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a volatility of 46.46%. This indicates that PAAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAAS | BYRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.22% | 46.46% | -31.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.86% | 74.13% | -29.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.23% | 82.31% | -26.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.19% | 75.22% | -27.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.60% | 96.16% | -46.56% |
Dividends
PAAS vs. BYRN - Dividend Comparison
PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 1.42% | 0.89% | 1.98% | 2.45% | 2.75% | 1.36% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.33% | 4.23% |
Financials
PAAS vs. BYRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan American Silver Corp. and Byrna Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAAS vs. BYRN - Profitability Comparison
PAAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
BYRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.
PAAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.
BYRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.
PAAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
BYRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAAS and BYRN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYRN has higher volatility (46.46%) compared to PAAS (15.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAS dropped -85.10% vs BYRN's -92.51%.
PAAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAAS and BYRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer