PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAS.TO achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than WPM.TO's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAS.TO has underperformed WPM.TO with an annualized return of 15.42%, while WPM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.


PAAS.TO

1D
-4.19%
1M
5.40%
YTD
3.44%
6M
18.78%
1Y
105.85%
3Y*
55.04%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
15.42%

WPM.TO

1D
-3.52%
1M
3.05%
YTD
8.12%
6M
15.76%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
43.22%
5Y*
25.93%
10Y*
22.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAAS.TO
Pan American Silver Corp.
3.44%148.70%37.51%0.37%-28.31%-27.25%43.89%55.86%2.74%-2.74%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
8.12%100.92%25.13%25.20%-0.53%3.47%39.06%47.18%-2.24%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAS.TO and WPM.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2002

0.70

The correlation between PAAS.TO and WPM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAAS.TO:

CA$30.88B

WPM.TO:

CA$79.13B

EPS

PAAS.TO:

CA$3.21

WPM.TO:

CA$3.96

PE Ratio

PAAS.TO:

22.78

WPM.TO:

43.97

PEG Ratio

PAAS.TO:

0.13

WPM.TO:

1.18

PS Ratio

PAAS.TO:

7.22

WPM.TO:

28.82

PB Ratio

PAAS.TO:

4.20

WPM.TO:

8.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAAS.TO:

CA$4.02B

WPM.TO:

CA$2.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAAS.TO:

CA$1.76B

WPM.TO:

CA$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAAS.TO:

CA$2.14B

WPM.TO:

CA$2.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAS.TO
PAAS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PAAS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM.TO
WPM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAAS.TOWPM.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

0.91

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

1.33

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.18

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.28

+2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.52

3.59

+5.93

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAS.TO and WPM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAAS.TOWPM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.91

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.79

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.64

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.35

-0.15

Drawdowns

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAS.TO drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than WPM.TO's maximum drawdown of -83.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS.TO and WPM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAAS.TOWPM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-83.21%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.01%

-30.69%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.01%

-30.69%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.10%

-39.04%

-16.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.97%

-47.50%

-18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.34%

-23.03%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-24.66%

-13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.16%

10.92%

+0.24%

Volatility

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.88% compared to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) at 16.44%. This indicates that PAAS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAAS.TOWPM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.88%

16.44%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.53%

36.54%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.63%

43.36%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.58%

33.07%

+12.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.41%

35.06%

+12.35%

Dividends

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Dividend Comparison

PAAS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than WPM.TO's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAAS.TO
Pan American Silver Corp.
1.17%0.91%1.89%2.51%2.63%1.35%0.67%0.60%0.91%0.67%0.33%3.86%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.58%0.57%1.05%1.25%1.83%1.31%1.08%1.24%1.75%1.54%1.06%1.77%

Financials

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan American Silver Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.15B
886.69M
(PAAS.TO) Total Revenue
(WPM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

PAAS.TO vs. WPM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pan American Silver Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
52.7%
77.5%
Portfolio components
PAAS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.

WPM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

PAAS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.

WPM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

PAAS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.

WPM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAAS.TO and WPM.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAS.TO and WPM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer