PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAOX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAOX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAOX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 9.01%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.


PAAOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
7.13%
6M
10.10%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
9.01%

TRLGX

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.03%
YTD
5.12%
6M
4.79%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
25.39%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAAOX
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund
7.13%27.78%11.30%-1.00%-19.33%-5.50%26.57%24.86%-11.26%43.07%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
5.12%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAOX and TRLGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2014

0.63

The correlation between PAAOX and TRLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAOX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAOX
PAAOX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAAOXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.38

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

1.94

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.19

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

3.75

+3.38

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAOX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAAOXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.38

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.58

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.85

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.58

-0.13

Drawdowns

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAOX drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAOX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAAOXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.02%

-55.56%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-18.18%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-21.17%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.46%

-40.44%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.02%

-40.44%

-2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-0.90%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-8.68%

-4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

5.72%

-1.69%

Volatility

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) is 0.00%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that PAAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAAOXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.27%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

12.35%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

15.59%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

22.38%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

21.76%

-4.09%

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAAOX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

PAAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than TRLGX's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAAOX
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund
3.21%0.64%0.00%1.55%1.51%7.43%1.33%0.62%0.61%0.13%2.12%0.89%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.02%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAAOX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to PAAOX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAOX dropped -43.02% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

PAAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAOX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer