PAAOX vs. TBCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX).
PAAOX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 20, 2014. TBCIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAOX T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund | -2.15% | 27.78% | 11.30% | -1.00% | -19.33% | -5.50% | 26.57% | 24.86% | -11.26% | 43.07% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | -14.54% | 18.94% | 48.73% | 49.61% | -38.48% | 18.30% | 34.90% | 30.30% | 2.13% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAAOX achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -14.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAOX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 8.25%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.
PAAOX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -12.67%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
TBCIX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAAOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAAOX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PAAOX
TBCIX
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAAOX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.54 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 0.94 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.50 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | 1.75 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAAOX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.54 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.44 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.69 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAAOX and TBCIX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison
PAAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than TBCIX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAOX T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 7.43% | 1.33% | 0.62% | 0.61% | 0.13% | 2.12% | 0.89% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | 6.09% | 5.20% | 18.28% | 3.47% | 5.84% | 10.03% | 1.18% | 0.59% | 2.50% | 3.05% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAAOX drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, roughly equal to the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAOX and TBCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAAOX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -43.26% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -16.96% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.76% | -43.26% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.02% | -43.26% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.70% | -16.96% | +3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -8.15% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 4.87% | -1.40% |
Volatility
PAAOX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) at 5.58%. This indicates that PAAOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAAOX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 5.58% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 11.76% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 22.49% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 23.88% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 22.69% | -5.10% |