PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAOX vs. MSAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAOX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than MSAQX's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAOX has underperformed MSAQX with an annualized return of 8.34%, while MSAQX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.


PAAOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.34%
YTD
7.13%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
8.34%
ALL TIME*
7.63%

MSAQX

1D
1.43%
1M
1.97%
6M
11.94%
YTD
14.25%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*
9.92%
ALL TIME*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAAOX
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund
7.13%27.78%11.30%-1.00%-19.33%-5.50%26.57%24.86%-11.26%43.07%
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
14.25%2.06%19.71%-6.83%-22.01%-20.52%52.55%44.74%-13.64%76.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAOX and MSAQX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.83

The correlation between PAAOX and MSAQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAOX vs. MSAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAAOX
PAAOX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PAAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MSAQX
MSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAAOXMSAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.09

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.43

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

1.08

+4.04

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the MSAQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAOX and MSAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAOX drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, smaller than the maximum MSAQX drawdown of -61.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAOX and MSAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAAOXMSAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.02%

-61.11%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-23.57%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-23.57%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.08%

-46.68%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.02%

-61.11%

+18.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-34.20%

+28.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-24.58%

+11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

9.43%

-4.84%

Volatility

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) is 0.00%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that PAAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAAOXMSAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

8.12%

-8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

22.04%

-9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

24.93%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

24.86%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

22.72%

-5.16%

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MSAQX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAAOX vs. MSAQX - Dividend Comparison

PAAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while MSAQX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%1.82%0.26%0.00%0.88%1.06%0.05%0.69%1.12%2.24%0.00%
PAAOX
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund
3.21%0.64%0.00%1.55%1.51%7.43%1.33%0.62%0.61%0.13%2.12%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAAOX and MSAQX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSAQX has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to PAAOX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAOX dropped -43.02% vs MSAQX's -61.11%.

PAAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAOX and MSAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer