PAAA vs. UUP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. PAAA is actively managed, while UUP is passively managed. Over the past year, PAAA returned 5.14% vs 6.66% for UUP. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. PAAA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUP.

Performance

PAAA vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAA achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 3.40% return.

PAAA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UUP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 6.66%
• 3Y*: 4.21%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: 3.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.14%	5.37%	7.47%	3.83%
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.40%	-4.99%	13.50%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and UUP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between PAAA and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAAA vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

UUP

UUP Risk / Return Rank: 36
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAAA	UUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.94	1.11	+9.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.40	1.60	+19.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.66	1.20	+5.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.67	1.83	+27.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	183.78	4.89	+178.89

PAAA vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAA Sharpe Ratio is 10.94, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAA and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and UUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAA	UUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-22.19%	+21.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-3.65%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.17%	+3.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-8.91%	+8.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	1.36%	-1.33%

Volatility

PAAA vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) is 0.11%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that PAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAAA	UUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	1.24%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	4.23%	-3.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47%	6.07%	-5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.97%	7.22%	-6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.97%	6.96%	-5.99%

PAAA vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAAA vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than UUP's 3.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.88%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.32%	3.43%	4.48%	6.44%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.03%	1.08%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAA and UUP in my portfolio?

PAAA and UUP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAAA or UUP?

UUP has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to PAAA (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAA dropped -1.04% vs UUP's -22.19%.

Which ETF is better, PAAA or UUP?

On 1-year performance, UUP leads with 6.66% vs 5.14% for PAAA. On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAAA or UUP?

Over the 1-year period, UUP has performed better with a 6.66% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAAA or UUP?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAAA or UUP?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 3.32% for UUP.

What is the main difference between PAAA and UUP?

PAAA is categorized as CLO, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.75% for UUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.94 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.