PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAA vs. CLOZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAA achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.53% return.


PAAA

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.45%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOZ

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.53%
6M
3.13%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
2.03%5.37%7.47%3.83%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
2.53%5.99%11.85%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and CLOZ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAA vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA
PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAAACLOZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.83

1.81

+9.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

21.80

2.31

+19.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.72

1.46

+5.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

30.32

1.60

+28.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

187.65

5.31

+182.34

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAA Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAA and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAAACLOZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83

1.81

+9.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.78

2.77

+4.02

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and CLOZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAAACLOZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-5.32%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.17%

-3.90%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.12%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.38%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.17%

-1.14%

Volatility

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) is 0.11%, while Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that PAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAAACLOZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

0.42%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

3.13%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49%

3.45%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.98%

3.80%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.98%

3.80%

-2.82%

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAAA vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than CLOZ's 7.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
7.39%7.63%9.09%8.81%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
4.88%5.12%5.88%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAAA and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOZ has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to PAAA (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAA dropped -1.04% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

On 1-year performance, CLOZ leads with 6.21% vs 5.26% for PAAA. On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 6.21% return vs 5.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.39%, compared with 4.88% for PAAA.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.50% for CLOZ.

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAA and CLOZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer