PA=F vs. IGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PA=F (Palladium) is an asset, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, PA=F returned 9.13%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for IGM. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PA=F vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palladium (PA=F) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PA=F achieves a -19.25% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PA=F has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 9.13%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.

PA=F

• 1D: -4.19%
• 1M: -10.80%
• YTD: -19.25%
• 6M: -12.77%
• 1Y: 28.37%
• 3Y*: -1.79%
• 5Y*: -14.30%
• 10Y*: 9.13%

IGM

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 16.93%
• YTD: 31.32%
• 6M: 29.19%
• 1Y: 62.26%
• 3Y*: 39.18%
• 5Y*: 22.04%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PA=F vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PA=F Palladium	-19.25%	79.07%	-17.98%	-38.30%	-5.52%	-22.50%	28.42%	59.67%	13.49%	54.27%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	31.32%	26.76%	36.99%	60.68%	-35.83%	25.72%	45.11%	41.81%	2.26%	37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PA=F and IGM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2006	0.20

Return for Risk

PA=F vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PA=F

PA=F Risk / Return Rank: 4
PA=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
PA=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
PA=F Omega Ratio Rank: 0
PA=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
PA=F Martin Ratio Rank: 10

IGM

IGM Risk / Return Rank: 79
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PA=F vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palladium (PA=F) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PA=F	IGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	3.07	-2.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	3.78	-2.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.50	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	3.81	-3.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	13.36	-11.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PA=F vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PA=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PA=F and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PA=F	IGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	3.07	-2.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	0.86	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	1.03	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.48	-0.30

Drawdowns

PA=F vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PA=F drawdown since its inception was -74.88%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PA=F and IGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PA=F	IGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.88%	-65.59%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.38%	-16.44%	-22.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.53%	-26.39%	-15.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.88%	-40.68%	-34.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.88%	-40.68%	-34.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.00%	-0.84%	-59.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.89%	-15.23%	-11.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.29%	4.67%	+14.62%

Volatility

PA=F vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

Palladium (PA=F) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 6.10%. This indicates that PA=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PA=F	IGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.37%	6.10%	+4.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.86%	16.08%	+31.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.77%	20.43%	+32.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.23%	25.68%	+18.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.63%	24.54%	+13.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PA=F and IGM in my portfolio?

PA=F and IGM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PA=F or IGM?

PA=F has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PA=F dropped -74.88% vs IGM's -65.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.