OWNS vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
OWNS and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OWNS is an actively managed fund by CCM. It was launched on Jul 27, 2021. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014.
Performance
OWNS vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OWNS vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 0.36% | 7.75% | 3.84% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 0.93% | 4.23% | 4.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWNS achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 0.93% return.
OWNS
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OWNS vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OWNS vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
OWNS
USFR
OWNS vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OWNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 14.37 | -13.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 42.77 | -41.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 10.64 | -9.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 103.21 | -101.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 658.56 | -654.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OWNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 14.37 | -13.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 8.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.57 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNS and USFR is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
OWNS vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than USFR's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 4.31% | 4.12% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 4.00% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
OWNS vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -5.39%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and USFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -1.36% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -0.04% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | 0.00% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.55% | -0.16% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 0.01% | +1.30% |
Volatility
OWNS vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that OWNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OWNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 0.08% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 0.19% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.09% | 0.29% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 0.41% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 0.81% | +4.67% |