OWNB vs. XRPZ
OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds - OWNB tracks the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Inde while XRPZ tracks the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OWNB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.
Performance
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWNB achieves a -17.12% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -39.28% return.
OWNB
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -12.84%
- 6M
- -29.13%
- YTD
- -17.12%
- 1Y
- -50.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPZ
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -47.87%
- YTD
- -39.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -17.12% | -4.06% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -39.28% | -11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNB and XRPZ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNB vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank
OWNB
XRPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWNB | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNB drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than XRPZ's maximum drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNB and XRPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNB | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -55.39% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.30% | -51.93% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.85% | -33.68% | +6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.75% | — | — |
Volatility
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNB | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.27% | 71.64% | -13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.16% | 71.64% | -9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.16% | 71.64% | -9.48% |
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWNB vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison
OWNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 1.05% | 0.87% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNB and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.
OWNB has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.
OWNB tracks Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Inde, while XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OWNB and 0.19% for XRPZ.
Find the right allocation for OWNB and XRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer