OWNB vs. ICRC
OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) and ICRC (Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OWNB is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Inde, while ICRC is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise. OWNB is passively managed, while ICRC is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OWNB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ICRC.
Performance
OWNB vs. ICRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWNB achieves a -17.24% return, which is significantly higher than ICRC's -22.02% return.
OWNB
- 1D
- -3.74%
- 1M
- -19.91%
- YTD
- -17.24%
- 6M
- -22.83%
- 1Y
- -42.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICRC
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -26.70%
- YTD
- -22.02%
- 6M
- -24.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB vs. ICRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -17.24% | -36.75% |
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | -22.02% | -32.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNB and ICRC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNB vs. ICRC — Risk / Return Rank
OWNB
ICRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OWNB vs. ICRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) and Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWNB | ICRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWNB vs. ICRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNB drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than ICRC's maximum drawdown of -55.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNB and ICRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNB | ICRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -55.65% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.37% | -51.41% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -33.44% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.92% | — | — |
Volatility
OWNB vs. ICRC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNB | ICRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.27% | 67.18% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.45% | 67.18% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.45% | 67.18% | -4.73% |
OWNB vs. ICRC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ICRC's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWNB vs. ICRC - Dividend Comparison
OWNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than ICRC's 51.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | 51.72% | 17.79% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 1.05% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNB and ICRC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OWNB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OWNB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICRC.
ICRC has the higher dividend yield at 51.72%, compared with 1.05% for OWNB.
OWNB is categorized as Blockchain, while ICRC is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OWNB and 0.98% for ICRC.
Find the right allocation for OWNB and ICRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer