OWNB vs. CBXJ
OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) and CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. OWNB is passively managed, while CBXJ is actively managed. Over the past year, OWNB returned -34.38% vs -21.37% for CBXJ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OWNB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXJ.
Performance
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWNB achieves a -9.32% return, which is significantly higher than CBXJ's -11.67% return.
OWNB
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -15.24%
- 1Y
- -34.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXJ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -11.67%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- 1Y
- -21.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -9.32% | -1.19% |
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -11.67% | -3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNB and CBXJ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between OWNB and CBXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNB vs. CBXJ — Risk / Return Rank
OWNB
CBXJ
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWNB | CBXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.81 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.73 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | -1.17 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNB drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than CBXJ's maximum drawdown of -29.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNB and CBXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNB | CBXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -29.25% | -30.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.47% | -29.25% | -30.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.91% | -29.25% | -19.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -11.33% | -14.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.62% | 18.30% | +17.32% |
Volatility
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) at 3.06%. This indicates that OWNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNB | CBXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 3.06% | +12.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.46% | 11.42% | +32.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.05% | 17.78% | +40.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.38% | 16.49% | +45.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.38% | 16.49% | +45.89% |
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWNB vs. CBXJ - Dividend Comparison
OWNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than CBXJ's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 2.23% | 1.97% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 0.96% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNB and CBXJ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWNB has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to CBXJ (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWNB dropped -59.47% vs CBXJ's -29.25%.
On 1-year performance, CBXJ leads with -21.37% vs -34.38% for OWNB. On fees, CBXJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CBXJ has performed better with a -21.37% return vs -34.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CBXJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.
CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.96% for OWNB.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OWNB and 0.69% for CBXJ.
OWNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OWNB and CBXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer