OWL vs. PDBC
OWL (Blue Owl Capital Inc.) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, OWL returned 2.16%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for PDBC. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
OWL vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a -22.03% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 30.19% return.
OWL
- 1D
- 8.35%
- 1M
- 23.45%
- 6M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -22.03%
- 1Y
- -36.54%
- 3Y*
- 1.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.59%
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 23.48%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 36.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $206.28M | $173.17M | $215.56M | |
| $116.66M | $151.96M | $123.92M |
OWL vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | -22.03% | -32.83% | 61.76% | 47.40% | -26.29% | 32.18% | 5.86% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 30.19% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWL and PDBC is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between OWL and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWL vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
OWL
PDBC
OWL vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWL | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.31 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 2.20 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 7.30 | -8.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWL vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWL | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.10% | -49.52% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.61% | -16.55% | -41.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -16.55% | -50.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.10% | -27.63% | -39.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -8.78% | -45.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.04% | -23.03% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.21% | 4.97% | +32.24% |
Volatility
OWL vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a higher volatility of 12.87% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 7.36%. This indicates that OWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWL | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.87% | 7.36% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.46% | 17.16% | +19.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.73% | 19.65% | +26.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.87% | 19.28% | +22.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.85% | 17.84% | +25.01% |
Dividends
OWL vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than PDBC's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | 8.11% | 5.72% | 2.92% | 3.69% | 4.06% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.95% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWL and PDBC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWL has higher volatility (12.87%) compared to PDBC (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWL dropped -67.10% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OWL and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer