PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWFIX vs. MBOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Westbury Fixed Income Fund (OWFIX) and Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWFIX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than MBOAX's 0.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OWFIX having a 1.62% annualized return and MBOAX not far behind at 1.55%.


OWFIX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
1.62%

MBOAX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.24%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OWFIX
Old Westbury Fixed Income Fund
-0.21%7.48%1.93%4.81%-8.39%-1.87%7.41%6.12%0.64%1.41%
MBOAX
Madison Core Bond Fund
0.01%6.96%1.14%5.63%-12.82%-1.85%9.22%8.31%-0.98%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between OWFIX and MBOAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 1998

0.86

The correlation between OWFIX and MBOAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWFIX vs. MBOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWFIX
OWFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
OWFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
OWFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MBOAX
MBOAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MBOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury Fixed Income Fund (OWFIX) and Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWFIXMBOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.40

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

4.01

+0.15

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the MBOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWFIX and MBOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWFIX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum MBOAX drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWFIX and MBOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWFIXMBOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-17.78%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-2.93%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.78%

-6.10%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.40%

-17.55%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.88%

-17.78%

+4.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-2.21%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-2.36%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.02%

-0.21%

Volatility

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Volatility Comparison

Old Westbury Fixed Income Fund (OWFIX) and Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) have volatilities of 0.93% and 0.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWFIXMBOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.94%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

2.78%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

3.73%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

5.61%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

4.66%

-1.10%

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWFIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MBOAX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWFIX vs. MBOAX - Dividend Comparison

OWFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than MBOAX's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBOAX
Madison Core Bond Fund
3.49%3.39%3.27%2.73%1.88%1.85%3.77%2.42%2.48%2.28%2.72%4.60%
OWFIX
Old Westbury Fixed Income Fund
3.83%4.72%3.95%3.08%2.06%1.91%5.05%1.88%1.90%1.49%1.33%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWFIX and MBOAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBOAX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to OWFIX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWFIX dropped -12.88% vs MBOAX's -17.78%.

OWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWFIX and MBOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer