OWACX vs. OWMBX
OWACX (Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund) and OWMBX (Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - OWACX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Old Westbury, while OWMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Old Westbury. Over the past 10 years, OWACX returned 14.04%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for OWMBX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. OWACX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for OWMBX.
Performance
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWACX achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than OWMBX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, OWACX has outperformed OWMBX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while OWMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.34% annualized return.
OWACX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
OWMBX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWACX Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund | 8.13% | 10.45% | 21.30% | 25.93% | -22.18% | 25.76% | 23.61% | 32.10% | -4.02% | 20.93% |
OWMBX Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund | 0.48% | 4.29% | 0.43% | 4.03% | -5.39% | -0.63% | 5.01% | 5.58% | 0.87% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWACX and OWMBX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | -0.02 |
The correlation between OWACX and OWMBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWACX vs. OWMBX — Risk / Return Rank
OWACX
OWMBX
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) and Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWACX | OWMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.64 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.86 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 5.07 | +4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWACX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than OWMBX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWACX and OWMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWACX | OWMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -9.54% | -24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.93% | -2.45% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -3.81% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.11% | -9.37% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.01% | -9.44% | -24.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -1.14% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -1.64% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 0.85% | +1.37% |
Volatility
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Volatility Comparison
Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX) at 0.41%. This indicates that OWACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OWMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWACX | OWMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 0.41% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | 1.45% | +9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 1.90% | +11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 3.11% | +14.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 3.04% | +15.49% |
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWACX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than OWMBX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWACX vs. OWMBX - Dividend Comparison
OWACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than OWMBX's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWACX Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund | 8.18% | 8.18% | 10.64% | 8.40% | 2.54% | 5.90% | 3.18% | 9.22% | 5.05% | 1.99% | 1.08% | 2.38% |
OWMBX Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund | 2.60% | 2.61% | 2.54% | 2.01% | 1.15% | 2.06% | 2.55% | 1.68% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.61% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWACX and OWMBX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWACX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to OWMBX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWACX dropped -34.01% vs OWMBX's -9.54%.
OWMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OWACX and OWMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer