PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVT vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OVT vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OVT vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
1.21%7.61%7.44%7.73%-9.68%2.07%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
0.65%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVT achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 0.65% return.


OVT

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
1.21%
6M
3.29%
1Y
8.33%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*

FLDR

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.86%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OVT vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OVT vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVT vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVTFLDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

4.59

-2.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.00

6.89

-3.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.22

-0.80

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

5.98

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.27

31.24

-14.97

OVT vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 4.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVT and FLDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVTFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

4.59

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

2.98

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.60

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between OVT and FLDR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

OVT vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

OVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than FLDR's 4.54% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
8.80%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.54%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%

Drawdowns

OVT vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVT drawdown since its inception was -13.59%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVT and FLDR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OVTFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.59%

-12.23%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-0.76%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.59%

-2.33%

-11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.15%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-0.36%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.14%

+0.39%

Volatility

OVT vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.42%. This indicates that OVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OVTFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

0.42%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

0.56%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

0.98%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

1.21%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

5.32%

-0.73%