OVT vs. COMT
OVT (Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OVT is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVT returned 3.01%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for COMT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OVT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
OVT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OVT achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
OVT
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 8.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
OVT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | 2.61% | 7.61% | 7.44% | 7.73% | -9.68% | 2.07% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 31.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVT and COMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021 | 0.04 |
The correlation between OVT and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OVT vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OVT
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
OVT
COMT
-
Financial Services
OVT
COMT
Communication Services
OVT
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
OVT
COMT
-
Healthcare
OVT
COMT
-
Industrials
OVT
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
OVT
COMT
-
Energy
OVT
COMT
-
Utilities
OVT
COMT
-
Real Estate
OVT
COMT
-
Basic Materials
OVT
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
OVT
COMT
OVT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.40 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.78 | 5.95 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.00 | 14.11 | +5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.24 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.64 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.20 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
OVT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVT drawdown since its inception was -13.59%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVT and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.59% | -51.89% | +38.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | -8.02% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.55% | -13.31% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.59% | -29.00% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -4.82% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -24.07% | +20.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 3.38% | -2.93% |
Volatility
OVT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) is 0.83%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that OVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 7.37% | -6.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 18.80% | -16.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 21.29% | -17.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 21.06% | -16.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.54% | 18.89% | -14.35% |
OVT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
OVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | 8.17% | 7.21% | 6.15% | 5.11% | 4.12% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OVT and COMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to OVT (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVT dropped -13.59% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 3.01% for OVT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.
OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.
OVT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVT and 0.48% for COMT.
OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OVT and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer