OVT vs. BSCZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ).

OVT and BSCZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OVT is an actively managed fund by Liquid Strategies. It was launched on Jan 14, 2021. BSCZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2025.

Performance

OVT vs. BSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OVT vs. BSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF	1.21%	6.01%
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF	-0.38%	5.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVT achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than BSCZ's -0.38% return.

OVT

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 3.29%
• 1Y: 8.33%
• 3Y*: 7.22%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: —

BSCZ

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVT vs. BSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCZ's 0.10% expense ratio.

OVT

Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF

BSCZ

Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

OVT vs. BSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVT

OVT Risk / Return Rank: 94
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVT vs. BSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OVT	BSCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OVT	BSCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.34	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between OVT and BSCZ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

OVT vs. BSCZ - Dividend Comparison

OVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than BSCZ's 3.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF	8.80%	7.21%	6.15%	5.11%	4.12%	4.41%
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF	3.25%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OVT vs. BSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVT drawdown since its inception was -13.59%, which is greater than BSCZ's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVT and BSCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVT	BSCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.59%	-3.28%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-2.01%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-0.58%	-2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OVT	BSCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99%	4.98%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.63%	4.98%	-0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.59%	4.98%	-0.39%