OVS vs. SCDS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OVS (Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OVS returned 36.35% vs 42.67% for SCDS. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. OVS charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.

Performance

OVS vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVS achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 22.66% return.

OVS

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 16.54%
• 1Y: 36.35%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: —

SCDS

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.01%
• YTD: 22.66%
• 6M: 21.54%
• 1Y: 42.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVS vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF	17.65%	6.15%	6.62%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	22.66%	11.27%	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between OVS and SCDS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024	0.95

The correlation between OVS and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

OVS vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OVS	SCDS
Financial Services	17.0%	14.7%
Technology	15.3%	20.8%
Industrials	15.3%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	10.7%
Healthcare	11.0%	11.0%
Real Estate	7.7%	4.9%
Energy	6.0%	3.9%
Basic Materials	5.2%	3.2%
Communication Services	3.6%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	2.2%
Utilities	2.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

OVS vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVS

OVS Risk / Return Rank: 64
OVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
OVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
OVS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
OVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
OVS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVS vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OVS	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.36	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.33	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	4.84	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.85	16.84	-2.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OVS vs. SCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the SCDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVS and SCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OVS	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.36	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.11	-0.67

Drawdowns

OVS vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVS drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, which is greater than SCDS's maximum drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVS and SCDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVS	SCDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.09%	-26.71%	-18.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-8.85%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-0.76%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-5.28%	-6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.54%	+0.09%

Volatility

OVS vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) is 4.58%, while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that OVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVS	SCDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	5.58%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	12.93%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.27%	18.20%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.23%	21.20%	+2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.47%	21.20%	+6.27%

OVS vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVS has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVS vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison

OVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than SCDS's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF	6.83%	3.69%	4.08%	3.19%	3.43%	4.05%	1.74%	0.54%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.92%	1.15%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVS and SCDS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, OVS and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OVS or SCDS?

SCDS has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to OVS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVS dropped -45.09% vs SCDS's -26.71%.

Which ETF is better, OVS or SCDS?

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 42.67% vs 36.35% for OVS. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, OVS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVS or SCDS?

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 42.67% return vs 36.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVS or SCDS?

SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for OVS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVS or SCDS?

OVS has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.92% for SCDS.

What is the main difference between OVS and SCDS?

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for OVS and 0.40% for SCDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.