PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVS vs. FDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVS vs. FDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVS achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than FDM's 7.48% return.


OVS

1D
-0.98%
1M
2.07%
YTD
17.65%
6M
16.54%
1Y
36.35%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

FDM

1D
-2.13%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.77%
1Y
27.59%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVS vs. FDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OVS
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF
17.65%6.15%11.07%17.20%-19.99%30.15%12.16%11.51%
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
7.48%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between OVS and FDM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.90

The correlation between OVS and FDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

OVS vs. FDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OVS
FDM

Financial Services

17.0%
41.2%

Technology

15.3%
6.2%

Industrials

15.3%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.0%

Healthcare

11.0%
6.2%

Real Estate

7.7%
1.4%

Energy

6.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.7%

Utilities

2.0%
1.0%

Financial Services

OVS
17.0%
FDM
41.2%

Technology

OVS
15.3%
FDM
6.2%

Industrials

OVS
15.3%
FDM
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

OVS
13.4%
FDM
10.0%

Healthcare

OVS
11.0%
FDM
6.2%

Real Estate

OVS
7.7%
FDM
1.4%

Energy

OVS
6.0%
FDM
5.0%

Basic Materials

OVS
5.2%
FDM
4.2%

Communication Services

OVS
3.6%
FDM
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

OVS
3.6%
FDM
4.7%

Utilities

OVS
2.0%
FDM
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVS vs. FDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVS
OVS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
OVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVS vs. FDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVSFDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.98

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.85

9.04

+4.81

OVS vs. FDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVS and FDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVSFDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.47

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.39

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.34

+0.09

Drawdowns

OVS vs. FDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVS drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum FDM drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVS and FDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVSFDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.09%

-63.45%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-9.30%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.49%

-23.47%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-23.74%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-4.31%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-11.35%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.06%

-0.43%

Volatility

OVS vs. FDM - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVSFDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.50%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

13.22%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

18.90%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

21.39%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.47%

23.36%

+4.11%

OVS vs. FDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVS has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FDM's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVS vs. FDM - Dividend Comparison

OVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than FDM's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.28%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
OVS
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF
6.83%3.69%4.08%3.19%3.43%4.05%1.74%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVS and FDM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FDM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVS dropped -45.09% vs FDM's -63.45%.

On 5-year performance, FDM leads with 8.37% vs 6.01% for OVS. On fees, FDM is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDM has performed better with a 8.37% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDM is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for OVS.

OVS has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 1.28% for FDM.

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for OVS and 0.60% for FDM.

OVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVS and FDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer