PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVB vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVB vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVB achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.


OVB

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.85%
1Y
7.85%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.91%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
19.14%
6M
18.06%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVB vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OVB
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
2.07%7.72%4.03%6.89%-16.96%0.71%9.40%1.10%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
19.14%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OVB and FAAR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019

-0.03

The correlation between OVB and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVB vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVB
OVB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
OVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVB vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OVBFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.52

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

15.18

-5.18

OVB vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVB Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVB and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OVB vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVB drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVB and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVBFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-18.03%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-6.29%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.18%

-11.54%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-18.03%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-6.29%

+5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-7.82%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.87%

-1.08%

Volatility

OVB vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) is 1.83%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that OVB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVBFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

2.55%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.85%

9.68%

-4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

13.38%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.34%

12.96%

-5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.58%

11.54%

-3.96%

OVB vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVB vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

OVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than FAAR's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.66%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
OVB
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
7.00%6.00%5.81%5.20%4.67%4.59%3.88%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVB and FAAR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to OVB (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVB dropped -21.69% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 5-year performance, FAAR leads with 7.72% vs 0.49% for OVB. On fees, OVB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, OVB has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 7.72% return vs 0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OVB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 7.00% for OVB.

OVB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OVB and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVB and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer