OVB vs. EDGF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

OVB (Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF) and EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OVB returned 7.08% vs 3.01% for EDGF. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

OVB vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVB achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than EDGF's 0.99% return.

OVB

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 7.08%
• 3Y*: 5.72%
• 5Y*: 0.61%
• 10Y*: —

EDGF

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVB vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OVB Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF	2.49%	7.72%	-3.55%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.99%	4.36%	-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between OVB and EDGF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.59

The correlation between OVB and EDGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OVB vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVB

OVB Risk / Return Rank: 47
OVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
OVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
OVB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
OVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
OVB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EDGF

EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 68
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVB vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OVB	EDGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.60	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.49	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	4.70	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	12.09	-3.02

OVB vs. EDGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVB Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the EDGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVB and EDGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OVB vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVB drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, which is greater than EDGF's maximum drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVB and EDGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVB	EDGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-1.62%	-20.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.49%	-0.64%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.08%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-0.45%	-6.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.25%	+0.54%

Volatility

OVB vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) at 0.40%. This indicates that OVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVB	EDGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.86%	0.40%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.87%	1.20%	+3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.97%	1.89%	+4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.34%	2.33%	+5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.58%	2.33%	+5.25%

OVB vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OVB and EDGF have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

OVB vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

OVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than EDGF's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.45%	3.61%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OVB Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF	6.97%	6.00%	5.81%	5.20%	4.67%	4.59%	3.88%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVB and EDGF in my portfolio?

OVB and EDGF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OVB or EDGF?

OVB has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to EDGF (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVB dropped -21.69% vs EDGF's -1.62%.

Which ETF is better, OVB or EDGF?

On 1-year performance, OVB leads with 7.08% vs 3.01% for EDGF. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, EDGF has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVB or EDGF?

Over the 1-year period, OVB has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVB or EDGF?

OVB and EDGF have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVB or EDGF?

OVB has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 3.45% for EDGF.

What is the main difference between OVB and EDGF?

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and 3EDGE Asset Management.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.