PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUST vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OUST vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUST achieves a 88.91% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -0.43% return.


OUST

1D
3.02%
1M
62.22%
YTD
88.91%
6M
60.25%
1Y
180.19%
3Y*
93.76%
5Y*
-20.38%
10Y*

NEM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-14.84%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
11.71%
1Y
91.07%
3Y*
36.63%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUST vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
88.91%77.09%59.32%-11.12%-83.40%-61.48%39.18%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-0.43%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%-4.02%

Correlation

The correlation between OUST and NEM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020

0.16

Fundamentals

EPS

OUST:

-$0.94

NEM:

$6.34

PS Ratio

OUST:

13.17

NEM:

4.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

OUST:

$185.33M

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OUST:

$90.79M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

OUST:

-$50.85M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUST vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUST
OUST Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUST Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUST vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSTNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.36

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

8.94

-2.84

OUST vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUST Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUST and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSTNEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.96

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.27

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.12

-0.27

Drawdowns

OUST vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUST drawdown since its inception was -98.01%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUST and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSTNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.01%

-81.30%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.15%

-27.25%

-27.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.00%

-36.57%

-27.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.57%

-62.40%

-35.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.84%

-24.65%

-50.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.08%

-41.38%

-36.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.68%

10.22%

+19.46%

Volatility

OUST vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Ouster, Inc. (OUST) has a higher volatility of 40.06% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 14.19%. This indicates that OUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSTNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.06%

14.19%

+25.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.84%

36.93%

+30.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.07%

46.87%

+54.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.60%

37.83%

+58.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.63%

35.59%

+60.04%

Dividends

OUST vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

OUST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OUST vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ouster, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
48.58M
0
(OUST) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OUST and NEM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUST has higher volatility (40.06%) compared to NEM (14.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUST dropped -98.01% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUST and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer