PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUNZ vs. SLVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OUNZ
VanEck Merk Gold Trust
8.61%59.42%
SLVR
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
6.06%170.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR's 6.06% return.


OUNZ

1D
3.75%
1M
-11.06%
YTD
8.61%
6M
21.13%
1Y
49.47%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
14.00%

SLVR

1D
8.91%
1M
-29.01%
YTD
6.06%
6M
38.57%
1Y
156.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OUNZ vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUNZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OUNZ vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUNZ
OUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
OUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVR
SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUNZSLVRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.57

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

2.67

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.00

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.98

13.77

-3.79

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SLVR Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUNZ and SLVR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUNZSLVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.57

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

2.42

-1.72

Correlation

The correlation between OUNZ and SLVR is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison

OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.


Drawdowns

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum SLVR drawdown of -38.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and SLVR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OUNZSLVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-38.60%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.14%

-38.60%

+19.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.18%

-29.01%

+15.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-6.83%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

11.21%

-6.04%

Volatility

OUNZ vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) is 10.95%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 23.19%. This indicates that OUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OUNZSLVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

23.19%

-12.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

53.62%

-29.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.59%

61.25%

-33.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

58.32%

-40.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

58.32%

-42.44%