OUNZ vs. SCHX
OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUNZ is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ returned 11.37%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for SCHX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OUNZ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a -7.16% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.
OUNZ
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -7.16%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 26.53%
- 5Y*
- 17.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.39%
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 19.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.51%
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF | -7.16% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 9.33% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUNZ and SCHX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, OUNZ and SCHX have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUNZ vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
OUNZ
SCHX
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUNZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.12 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | 9.05 | -7.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -26.31%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUNZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.31% | -34.33% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.31% | -9.02% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.31% | -19.04% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.31% | -25.41% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.31% | -34.33% | +8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.79% | -1.95% | -23.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -3.95% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.23% | 2.11% | +9.12% |
Volatility
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 3.18%. This indicates that OUNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUNZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 3.18% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.99% | 10.06% | +13.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 12.72% | +15.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 17.21% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 18.14% | -2.02% |
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUNZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OUNZ vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUNZ and SCHX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OUNZ has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SCHX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUNZ dropped -26.31% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 14.84% vs 11.37% for OUNZ. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OUNZ.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.
OUNZ is categorized as Gold, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OUNZ and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUNZ and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer