PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUNZ vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a -7.16% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 11.37%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.


OUNZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
-5.03%
6M
-12.66%
YTD
-7.16%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
26.53%
5Y*
17.02%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

IDMO

1D
2.55%
1M
-1.60%
6M
7.26%
YTD
9.44%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
12.43%
ALL TIME*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUNZ
VanEck Merk Gold ETF
-7.16%63.95%26.75%12.83%-0.51%-4.00%24.71%18.00%-2.06%12.82%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
9.44%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between OUNZ and IDMO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014

0.18

Over the past year, OUNZ and IDMO have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUNZ vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUNZ
OUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
OUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUNZIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.79

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

6.94

-5.21

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUNZ and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -26.31%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUNZIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-39.38%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.31%

-12.31%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-12.65%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-27.07%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.31%

-31.34%

+5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.79%

-2.90%

-22.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-9.69%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.23%

3.17%

+8.06%

Volatility

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUNZIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.44%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.99%

17.08%

+6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.86%

18.71%

+9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

18.15%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

17.91%

-1.79%

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OUNZ and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OUNZ vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.65%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
OUNZ
VanEck Merk Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUNZ and IDMO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to OUNZ (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUNZ dropped -26.31% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.43% vs 11.37% for OUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUNZ and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.

OUNZ is categorized as Gold, while IDMO is Momentum. OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUNZ and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer